Talk:fagmosexual

RFV discussion: May–July 2014
You would think the only hope for this one would be Usenet, but the cite already in this entry refers to the only Usenet post that contains this word (if Google Groups is to be believed). The other cite on the entry is not, as best I can tell, a durable citation.

There are only two Google Books hits, one of which doesn't appear to even contain this word. This, that and the other (talk) 11:26, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Failed. Citations moved to Citations:fagmosexual. — Ungoliant (falai) 00:49, 15 July 2014 (UTC)