Talk:fboms

Request for verification
Really? Caps seem to be wrong if OK. SemperBlotto 21:07, 15 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Not sure what you are talking about, caps?


 * caps:: capital letters, i.e. it should probably be at FBOMS if it exists. Equinox ◑ 16:27, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

what do you mean a request for validation? thanks


 * We need proof that this word really exists. Proof can be citations from books or certain other published sources. See WT:CFI. Equinox ◑ 00:18, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

''Note: the below green-barred comments were previously in the wrong section. The lack of timely reply may be due to other editors' not understanding what the questions were in reference to. —Ruakh TALK 20:28, 7 November 2009 (UTC)''

What do you mean, it is in all caps? What do you mean it should be AT FBOMS? I'm new to this, thanks.


 * Do people write "fboms", or "FBOMS"? If people write "FBOMS", then the entry should be located at [[FBOMS]] — that is, at http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/FBOMS — rather than at [[fboms]]. The reason we ask is that the entry itself writes "FBOMS" (in the "Quotations" section). —Ruakh TALK 20:33, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

I'm not sure it's pub;ished in a book anywhere but I've heard about it for years and I know that several Las Vegas oddsmakers use a system based on it. does it have to be a a reference from a book?


 * We need durably archived quotations. These can come from books, newspaper and magazine articles, articles in academic journals, even Usenet postings — anywhere durable. —Ruakh TALK 20:33, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Hello?


 * Deleted. Even the expansion of the acronym is nowhere in BGC. Equinox ◑ 17:16, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

I have heard of FBOMS and it is pretty well known around the football betting activity, why is it not here?