Talk:ficio

ficio
This just looks like a page for and  in the form of compounds, but I don't think this is an attestable word. Caladon 17:57, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * This should simply be deleted if anyone does not disagree with me since I cannot find it anywhere. One thing to consider though is that all the verb forms require deletion as well. Caladon 09:34, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The first few pages of Google Books hits are "bene-ficio", "ponti-ficio", "sacri-ficio", "arti-ficio", "aedi-ficio"; "per-ficiunt", "de-ficiunt", &c. Should we keep the entry as # though? - -sche (discuss) 15:25, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * If you decide to delete it, let me know. I will delete the bot-generated verb forms. SemperBlotto 15:28, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * RFV-failed as an independent word, but kept as a . If you think it should not be kept, please reopen this discussion and ask for deletion. - -sche (discuss) 02:51, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Deleted as having failed RFV. The non-gloss sense was not cited any more than the previous sense had been. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 18:05, 21 January 2013 (UTC)