Talk:fonologio

RFV discussion: June–August 2017
Speciafically, that it is countable. There are two hits for "fonologioj" on soc.culture.esperanto. I am not sure if I am being overly Draconian in expecting more.__Gamren (talk) 18:14, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Since has a countable sense, it's reasonable to assume that  can have that sense too, and that the plural is . (What else could it possibly be?) I'd be willing to consider the countability of  verified if people find cases where it's clearly used in the countable sense, even if the citation actually uses the singular. For example, I'd consider this evidence that  is countable and thus that  exists in principle. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 11:51, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I agree with that analysis. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 20:08, 2 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Pursuant to the evidence above, I consider this RFV passed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 20:35, 9 August 2017 (UTC)