Talk:fooder

RFV discussion — sense failed
Contributor says it's a protologism, but I'm not so sure.—msh210 ℠  21:14, 28 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I find it almost exclusively in terms like "free-fooder", "raw fooder", "raw-fooder", "fast-fooder", "anti-fast-fooder". IOW it is almost always formed by adding -er: to an open or hyphenated compound. How should it be presented, then, whether or not it an be attested as a stand-alone? DCDuring TALK 21:44, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Added that sense (and others which are attested); converted this to a .—msh210  ℠  23:47, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

RFV failed, sense removed. Thanks, msh210, for the other senses, and for the citations for them. —Ruakh TALK 01:10, 7 November 2009 (UTC)