Talk:full-deckism

Don't think it is attestable yet per CFI sources. I found one on Google Groups. Equinox ◑ 20:29, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

RFV discussion: December 2015–January 2016
Equinox pointed this out years ago, but it's not at all clear that this meets CFI, and if it does, BGC suggests it may do so in the form full deckism. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 06:21, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I can't find any instances with the hyphen. Most of the instances without are by Malcolm Kushner. Including one of his and one other one, I get:
 * which still leaves us short of one cite. Kiwima (talk) 18:47, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Here is a plural. Chuck Entz (talk) 20:25, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
 * And here, here and here are some hyphenated ones from Usenet. Chuck Entz (talk) 21:43, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Here is a plural. Chuck Entz (talk) 20:25, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
 * And here, here and here are some hyphenated ones from Usenet. Chuck Entz (talk) 21:43, 25 December 2015 (UTC)


 * RFV passed, but I'm converting it to an alt form of full deckism. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 19:40, 24 January 2016 (UTC)