Talk:fulth

RFV discussion: October–November 2017
Leasnamisms? Any evidence that these words have been used? Equinox ◑ 07:52, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * fulth is a Scottish word. It's also Scots. It's also in Century. that's where it came from. Leasnam (talk) 18:20, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * We have Scots available as an L2 header, you know. As you also should know, Scots citations don't count for attestation of English definitions.
 * Century is not definitive about the legitimacy by our standard of the archaisms that they include. You do include a references header and link to Century in such entries, don't you? DCDuring (talk) 12:54, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * , I do now. Back then, no one had a problem with it, so I didn't think to. How much of my current work is of the sort that causes fuss ? Do you really expect me to remember all the pages I have created and go back and check them ? That's crazzzzy, there are hundrrreds if not thoussssands of them Leasnam (talk) 14:23, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If only there were some way of finding one's contributions during a given time period. DCDuring (talk) 15:44, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

RFV-resolved Removed one uncited entry (which was not very different from sense 1), kept the two cited entries. Kiwima (talk) 19:11, 18 November 2017 (UTC)