Talk:get cross

get cross
get: + cross:. DCDuring TALK 19:48, 6 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Agreed. Delete. get: + any adjective is a standard syntactical structure. -- A LGRIF  talk  11:49, 7 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Yeah strong delete, should be covered at get, or possibly Appendix:English collocations of get. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:51, 7 February 2011 (UTC)


 * If ever there was a time when words had multiple meanings....
 * Still, I feel like this should be deleted, weakly. Maybe something like Mglovesfun suggests would be useful. DAVilla 15:35, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. (No need to appendicify as Martin suggested: get collocates with every adjective I can think of offhand.) &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 21:23, 7 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. —Ruakh TALK 03:51, 8 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Strong delete. ---&gt; Tooironic 04:13, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Deleted. Mglovesfun (talk) 14:21, 28 February 2011 (UTC)