Talk:ghost-tweeter

RFV discussion

 * Title was: ghost twitter, ghost-tweeter.

Attestable? I think not. Equinox ◑ 03:04, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Both pretty attestable, especially the first one which spells out the definition pretty well. Mglovesfun (talk) 21:53, 7 August 2009 (UTC)


 * I cannot find three suitable citations. Equinox ◑ 21:34, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

RFV failed, entry deleted (by, a week and a half ago). —Ruakh TALK 17:23, 23 August 2010 (UTC)


 * We will definitely be revisiting such terms. Consider the following line on the table of corpora at BYU: The Twitter Corpus (coming in Fall 2010) 	400 million words  	2010. DCDuring TALK  17:48, 23 August 2010 (UTC)


 * I just threw up in my mouth. Equinox ◑ 00:21, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * To make you feel worse: BNC has 100 million words. DCDuring TALK 00:44, 24 August 2010 (UTC)