Talk:gi

RFV discussion: February–April 2019
All of them lack citations. I have only ever seen the pronouns "gi" and "geli" in proposals and never in actual usage. Maybe they should be removed from the Wikipedia pages too, if they can't be cited. That sense of "ĝi" is really uncommon, and I wonder if it can be cited. The pronouns "ŝli" and "ri" can probably be cited. 12:28, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
 * For ŝli:     Three of these are by the same person. ←₰-→  Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  09:45, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Found three citations for ri, by different people. פֿינצטערניש (talk) 09:29, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Also on ri, the song by La Perdita Generacio cited by Robin van der Vliet is durably archived, for the record. I moved two of my lower-quality citations to the Citations page. פֿינצטערניש (talk) 07:53, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I added 3 citations to ŝli. 18:34, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Ri and ŝli seem to have passed RFV, no? פֿינצטערניש (talk) 15:42, 12 March 2019 (UTC)


 * I noticed this discussion because a quotation was added to ĝi, but I don't think it unambiguously supports this sense—the ĝi in that quotation seems to refer back to the word estaĵo—so while the sentence is a little unusual, it is easily explained as a use of the standard sense of ĝi.
 * Ŝli is the only one of these that I've encountered "in the wild" (outside of dictionaries and discussions of grammar), so I'm glad it has been adequately cited. I'm busy with other projects at the moment, so I don't want to spend the time hunting for citations for the other pronouns. I doubt geli or hi can be cited anyway. Ĝi might be citeable but quotations of this extremely rare sense must be like a needle in a haystack. —Granger (talk · contribs) 12:05, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
 * For my part I don't think I've ever encountered ŝli "in the wild", but I have definitely seen ri a lot. פֿינצטערניש (talk) 12:20, 14 March 2019 (UTC)


 * All RFV failed except and, which are RFV passed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 06:29, 7 April 2019 (UTC)