Talk:glëmza

RFV
Archaic and regional, not widely used. Maro 18:16, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * So, you're confident this exists? Mglovesfun (talk) 18:20, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Can be found in some dictionaries from 19th c., but I don't know if it's Polish or Kashubian. Maro 18:33, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Two hundred years ago Kashubian was considered as a Polish dialect so this word was in "Polish" dictionaries. Maro 18:40, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Do you think it's definitely citable in a language (just not necessarily Polish)? Mglovesfun (talk) 11:25, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
 * It's in the Słownik Etymologiczny Kaszubszczyzny, volume 2 ISBN 8386619813, so it appears to meet the CFI to which Kashubian words are subject (one durably-archived reference mentions it as a Kashubian word). A number of durably-archived references, including dictionaries of Polish, mention it as a Polish word, too, but (as Maro says) they date from an era when Kashubian was considered Polish. (They're also not uses, so it's unclear whether or not this can meet CFI as a Polish word after all.) I created this entry and the following one; would anyone object to me changing their L2s to ==Kashubian==? - -sche (discuss) 21:32, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I have changed the entry accordingly. - -sche (discuss) 21:29, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Archaic and regional, not widely used. Maro 18:17, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I have changed the entry as I suggested in the discussion of glomza (currently at WT:RFV, later to be archived to Talk:glomza or WT:RFVA). - -sche (discuss) 21:29, 28 June 2013 (UTC)