Talk:go from strength to strength

RFV discussion: April 2017
I was just wondering whether the article should be on "from strength to strength" without the "go". If I am right about that then it would not be a verb. John Cross (talk) 07:12, 27 April 2017 (UTC)


 * I think it should be left alone, it makes more sense as it is now. DonnanZ (talk) 09:09, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
 * This isn't really an RfV question, rather a Tea Room item.
 * From strength to strength is occasionally used with other verbs, such as grow, continue, went on, as well as in titles without any verb. I would try to reword the definition to suit the prepositional phrase, move the entry to [[from strength to strength]], and make [[go from strength to strength]] a redirect as it is by far the most common use in running text. DCDuring (talk) 09:52, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Move this to the Tea Room then. DonnanZ (talk) 10:39, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Please see: Tea_room/2017/April

John Cross (talk) 15:17, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

from strength to strength
With ever-increasing success --Backinstadiums (talk) 10:10, 27 March 2021 (UTC)