Talk:green knowledge

Request for verification

 * 1) Knowledge a person shares with the intent for it to be easily recycled/re-used in the future by others.

Is this right? Mglovesfun (talk) 23:28, 14 July 2009 (UTC)


 * The book The Making of Green Knowledge seems to use the term in the sense of 'body of knowledge about the environment'. Pingku 15:15, 15 July 2009 (UTC)


 * I wonder whether this is a sign of extending the "recycling" aspect of greenness and the word "green" to new realms. Are we missing a sense at green, or should something there be reworded? Does green now mean, among other things, "reusable", "extendable" as might apply to wikis or software objects as well as tangible objects? DCDuring TALK 15:37, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * |+software+|+code+green+(recycle+|+reuse)&lr=&ei=IPtdSp7VMp-8zASp4LS6Bw This is what I'm talking about. Is there more? DCDuring TALK 15:54, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The opposite.  &#x200b;—  msh210  ℠  17:21, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Indeed. A lot of mentions of "greenfield" software development (starting from scratch}, too. In any event, not yet, it seems. DCDuring TALK 19:04, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

RFV failed, entry deleted. —Ruakh TALK 18:37, 4 November 2009 (UTC)