Talk:gurmies

RFV discussion: January–March 2024
I can't find this (or its supposed plural). Compare the RFV of gurmy. - -sche (discuss) 02:19, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
 * @-sche The only thing I can think of is that this comes from a printing error of, since "nn" could look like "rm" if the ink is a bit patchy. Theknightwho (talk) 02:23, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Yeah. It seems to be a printing error on some reference works' part, too, rather than one any user of the term made. (FWIW I did add 3 cites to the expected/normal n n spelling.) - -sche (discuss) 08:23, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
 * So ** was a mistakenly back-formed singular of a printing error that somehow made it into Webster's... Theknightwho (talk) 09:05, 18 January 2024 (UTC)


 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 14:28, 22 March 2024 (UTC)