Talk:gussy

Tea room discussion
Should this be moved to gussy up, or should we have separate entries for each? --EncycloPetey 19:46, 14 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Move it. At least among the first 200 results for "gussy" without "up", I see one use in this sense, and even that one is really just a misunderstanding (on the part of the character) of "gussy up" (see the previous page in the book). S.v. gussy we can have .—msh210 ℠ 19:53, 14 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Done. --EncycloPetey 20:02, 14 November 2008 (UTC)


 * But it is an English word; it seems like we should have some sort of entry for it, even if it's just a stub. How about  or &lt;span class="use-with-mention">Used in the expression &lt;span class="mention">[&#x5B;gussy up]]&lt;/span>.&lt;/span> ( Used in the expression gussy up . )? —Ruakh TALK 15:32, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Words that are only used as particles of a phrase should nonetheless have entries, in case someone looks up the particle. bd2412 T 20:35, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Doesn't gussy currently say in effect the same thing?—msh210 ℠ 04:52, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

todo
coordinate term of bussy Arlo Barnes (talk) 20:36, 2 November 2022 (UTC)