Talk:haîsseux d'femmes

RFD discussion: July 2017–February 2018
Probably a useful translation but hardly deserving of its own entry. — (((Romanophile))) ♞ (contributions) 09:13, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
 * If it just means "hater of women" (as I suspect) then delete as SOP. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 18:57, 31 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. is a single word and it's entered as a translation there. DonnanZ (talk) 16:14, 1 August 2017 (UTC).
 * That's not a good enough to reason to keep. The translation line can just as easily say  if the Norman is SOP. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 16:22, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, but if 🇨🇬 or an equivalent is not used in Norman (that needs verification) I would still say "keep". DonnanZ (talk) 16:29, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep since Frenhc is known to use multi-word phrases where other languages use single words. This is not standrd French, I get that, but the grammar seems to be similare.  Lollipop (talk) 20:09, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Those voting keep seem to be ignoring the grounds upon which a term can be kept. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 20:30, 7 August 2017 (UTC)


 * is a verifiable synonym of misogynist, so I don't see any reason for objection to this. It looks as though the equivalent in quite a few languages is woman-hater instead of or as well as misogynist. All translations are under though. DonnanZ (talk) 10:18, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, SOP until proven otherwise. --Barytonesis (talk) 16:37, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, and if it passes, RFV it. — Ungoliant (falai) 16:43, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 09:53, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. PseudoSkull (talk) 22:09, 27 December 2017 (UTC)


 * There's a clear consensus to delete here. Can someone close this as such? PseudoSkull (talk) 22:09, 27 December 2017 (UTC)


 * If the entry gets deleted but the translation changed to haîsseux d'femmes, should the translation be RFVed (WT:RFVN)? -80.133.99.129 22:31, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Do you mean RFVing the English entry,, or do you mean RFVing the listing of on its translation table? — Ungoliant (falai) 22:36, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Of course I mean RFVing the translation in the translation table, and not RFVing the english entry. Whether or not or  is put into the translation section, doesn't really matter to me. -80.133.99.129 22:41, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
 * There’s no protocol, as far as I know. Occasionally people start an RFV or Tea Room discussion requesting evidence of the existence of a translation, but the usual practice is to simply remove it if you’re sure it’s wrong or doesn’t exist. You can change the template to, but there’s no guarantee that no one will simply “check” it without evidence of existence. — Ungoliant (falai) 22:47, 27 December 2017 (UTC)


 * RFD failed with 7 in favour of deletion and 2 in favour of keeping. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 20:33, 20 February 2018 (UTC)