Talk:haet

haet
Second sense. I see no evidence of this spelling of have/hast. The quotation offered seems to actually be "hast," not "haet." Atelaes 02:14, 6 February 2008 (UTC)


 * b.g.c. agrees with you; on our linked page it doesn't highlight anything, but if you change dq=haet to dq=hast in the URI, it highlights the right word. —Ruakh TALK 02:38, 6 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Looking closer, all the b.g.c. hits seem to be scanning errors. --Connel MacKenzie 05:28, 6 February 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm going to jump the gun a bit and remove the sense. If anyone can actually find cites for this, by all means feel free to reinstate it.  Sense removed Atelaes 05:50, 6 February 2008 (UTC)