Talk:halfalogue

Once the paper gets published I'll update the source reference. That will make it appear "in a refereed academic journal", and clear the RFV tag. WikiWilliamP 15:58, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Please let someone more familiar with our procedures clear the tag. DCDuring TALK 16:01, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I didn't say I'd clear the tag, I just said I'll update the reference. That should resolve the RFV and clear the tag.

RFV discussion
Only in one news article so far. Protologism, I think. Equinox ◑ 16:13, 20 May 2010 (UTC)


 * But, requoted in many blogs about it. People are catching on to the word "halfalogue" quite easily. WikiWilliamP 12:16, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * This isn't a debate, we're looking for reliable evidence of use. It gets a month, and if it fails and is deleted, it can be reentered at any time provided it is cited per WT:CFI. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:27, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The coining article hasn't been published yet. Any coverage wouldn't seem to be "independent", as I understand the term as used in WT:CFI. There would seem to be no chance that the word would be includable before May 19, 2011, based on our "spanning one year" clause. DCDuring TALK 14:55, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

RFV failed, entry moved redirectlessly to Citations:halfalogue. —Ruakh TALK 19:57, 16 September 2010 (UTC)