Talk:halldorophone

RFV discussion: February 2020
DTLHS (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
 * cited Kiwima (talk) 16:41, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * The cites go:
 * Alice Eldridge, Chris Kiefer, in Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Computation, Communication, Aesthetics and X, capitalized mid-sentence
 * Alice Eldridge, Chris Kiefer, in Proceedings of New Interfaces for Musical Expression, uncapitalized
 * Andrew Hugill, in The Digital Musician, in single quotes and capitalized mid-sentence
 * Halldór Úlfarsson, in Proceedings of New Interfaces for Musical Expression, uncapitalized
 * Thanos Polymeneas Liontiris, in Proceedings of New Interfaces for Musical Expression, uncapitalized, no article (I'm guessing editing carelessness)
 * I appreciate the work Kiwima put into citing this, and they're probably over the line, but, for instance, there's no three independent cites (not counting the Proceedings of NIME as independent of each other) that are all either capitalized or uncapitalized. Only the Hugill cite can be found in Google Books, so adding cites is not trivial. It's not a hill I want to die on, but I'm curious how others feel.--Prosfilaes (talk) 03:23, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Huh? The 2017 and the two 2018 quotes (2, 4, and 5) are all lower-cased and independent. You can't consider two papers dependent simply because they were delivered at the same conference. The 2016 (1) is not independent of the 2017, and we could just get rid of it, but I added it to show date range. Kiwima (talk) 03:46, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
 * I'd throw out 1 and 3. The community of users of the word is so small that independence could be questioned. Some of the uses seem pro forma, just showing familiarity with the literature. Are such uses independent of the footnoted paper? There is a 2019 pdf that is supposed to for an article in press. It seems more nearly independent of the others. DCDuring (talk) 04:07, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

RFV-passed Kiwima (talk) 20:22, 24 February 2020 (UTC)