Talk:hamplanet

RFV discussion: September 2016–April 2017
Can't find any cites, but sending to RFV just in case, because it is actually used. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 03:29, 18 September 2016 (UTC)


 * I've added a few. Kiwima (talk) 06:58, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * But none are from what we accept as durably archived sources. Usenet? DCDuring TALK 11:45, 18 September 2016 (UTC)


 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:32, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Recreated by User:Ioaxxere and still not properly cited: two are mentions, not uses, and the third is "ham planet" with a space. Equinox ◑ 13:37, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
 * — don't delete it yet. It's citable off of Scholar. Ioaxxere (talk) 13:59, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
 * ✅ Ioaxxere (talk) 22:38, 18 May 2023 (UTC)


 * I wasn't planning to delete it because (in this case) I've seen it online enough, for enough years, that I can't dispute the existence. Still, we have the rules for a reason (minimum quality/sanity filter), and if you can cite something to CFI quality you should do so in the first place... to avoid all this. Equinox ◑ 04:59, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Yessir. Back in the day I was a bit gung ho with quoting mentions... Ioaxxere (talk) 05:13, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

True origin?
It said it was from Reddit, but an IP has just removed that. Can we confirm/deny? Equinox ◑ 16:14, 9 December 2023 (UTC)