Talk:haruspicis

RfV discussion for English plural of haruspex entry
I wager that this erroneous entry stems from an editor’s misunderstanding of haruspex, wherein the singular genitive, rather than the plural nominative form is listed after the lemma. The correct plural form is haruspic e s. †  ﴾(u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 17:46, 5 November 2007 (UTC)


 * I corrected it. Angr 18:50, 5 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Clearly an error. Strickenthrough and RFVfailed. †  ﴾(u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 21:06, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Requests for verification - kept
Kept. See archived discussion of November 2007. 05:04, 20 January 2008 (UTC)