Talk:have a word with

have a word with
 I think these are SOP. We should add have a word and delete these two. Let's have a word about it! --Hekaheka 09:45, 4 June 2010 (UTC) Added "have a word". --Hekaheka 09:52, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Could redirect IMO, but yes having three separate entries is bad. Mglovesfun (talk) 10:15, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I should have checked before I added have a word with someone. Yeah, I support keeping have a word and deleting the rest. ---&gt; Tooironic 13:13, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Could you do the Chinese translation? It's now from "have a word with someone". --Hekaheka 13:39, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * No worries. Done. ---&gt; Tooironic 14:53, 4 June 2010 (UTC)


 * I'm gonna go ahead and delete those two entries. One of them was my fault anyway. I can't see any valid reason why we should keep them, but I will maintain redirects. ---&gt; Tooironic 08:19, 8 June 2010 (UTC)