Talk:haxx0r

Requests for deletion - kept
Kept. See archived discussion of February 2009. 07:16, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Request for verification
Sent hither from RFD, where it was kept on condition it's attested.—msh210 ℠  23:01, 16 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Only one Googlebooks entry that I could find, and it is already cited in the article. Could not find any definitions in any other online dictionary.  This looks to me like it could be a neologism, or protologism.  I cannot verfy this entry at this time. Razorflame 06:54, 20 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I added that book one and forgot to mention it here. There's plenty more on Usenet, though, if anyone is inclined to wade through it. Equinox ◑ 17:18, 21 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Now cited.—msh210 ℠  22:48, 23 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I don't feel comfortable passing it with pseduonyms like "VoRtEx" and "Mentski", although in all honesty those are better quotations than the other Usenet cite, which is intentionally illiterate. DAVilla 19:03, 18 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Passed RFV. Leet words are, anyhow, "intentionally illiterate", but they are still words, just like the (attestable) eye dialect that we document. Equinox ◑ 17:19, 6 December 2009 (UTC)