Talk:headedness

Request for verification
Maybe this should be an RFD, but anyway it seems to me that this combining form isn't really one. "X-headedness" words are not X + headedness, but rather X-headed + -ness. < class="latinx">Ƿidsiþ 18:27, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Agree on both, move to RFV, and it's not a suffix or combining form. Mglovesfun (talk) 19:18, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * You can find this term all by itself, just check the first page of google books. Seems to have a meaning in linguistics. Polarpanda 20:49, 2 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Cited, cheaply, using one JSTOR cite, though some rewriting may be in order. —Ruakh TALK 23:28, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Looks good! < class="latinx">Ƿidsiþ 09:06, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Passed, detagging, striking. &#x200b;—msh210℠ 22:50, 7 April 2010 (UTC)