Talk:heuristic principle

RFV discussion: October 2017
I've done the most urgent cleanup, e.g. part of speech, citation not using the word (!). Still makes no sense to me. Equinox ◑ 12:28, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The entry seems to be founded on ignorance of the meaning of of. One can find various nouns after the heuristic principle of, eg, causality, coherence, generate-and-test. By the heuristic principle of ignorance-of-semantics apparently applied in the definition at hand, one would need different definitions for each attestable one of these, not to mention each gerundive ("reducing non value-adding activities") or proper name ("Simmel").
 * The most obvious definition is heuristic + principle. I find it hard to imagine any other definition.
 * Moreover, a look at shows no OneLook reference includes the term.
 * If these arguments make sense to you, you may not want to waste too much time trying to cite this. If your intuition or logic says otherwise, go for it. DCDuring (talk) 12:56, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Nothing here makes any sense to me. I would just delete it. SemperBlotto (talk) 05:36, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

RFV-failed