Talk:homo marriage

homo marriage
Obvious SOP added by the author because it applies to his gay lifestyle. --Æ&#38;Œ (talk) 17:24, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
 * First of all, you added it yourself. Second of all, you also added homomarriage, so now WT:COALMINE applies unless homomarriage is not citable. If you want it to be deleted, why did you add it? --WikiTiki89 17:36, 20 December 2013 (UTC)


 * homomarriage is just homo + marriage. --Æ&#38;Œ (talk) 17:47, 20 December 2013 (UTC)


 * You do know about WT:COALMINE, don't you? --WikiTiki89 17:56, 20 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Is WT:COALMINE a Wiktionary policy? If it is, then that automatically makes it worthless. All that matters is common practice. --Æ&#38;Œ (talk) 18:08, 20 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Yes it's a policy, and the common practice happens to be to follow it, despite the editors (including me) who disagree with it. --WikiTiki89 18:21, 20 December 2013 (UTC)


 * We don’t need policies; Wiktionary can exist without any policies. --Æ&#38;Œ (talk) 18:42, 20 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Without policies, there would no criteria for blocking people for making bad edits. --WikiTiki89 18:50, 20 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Ah who cares. Let the admins block whomever they want! It’s not like they ever needed reasons, well, aside from the fact that blocking is fun. --Æ&#38;Œ (talk) 19:06, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Move homomarriage to RFV (and delete both once it fails). Ƿidsiþ 18:00, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Does this ever mean a gay person's straight marriage of convenience? Including this would seem to be justified, nay, required by our slogan with no justification in CFI for excluding it (even without COALMINE). Similarly for breeder marriage, which is attestable on Usenet from a few different groups. DCDuring TALK 22:01, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

On the contrary, I would to request the deletion of this entry on the grounds that it’s an idiotic word and I don’t want to be associated with it. My comments above were just me making a damned idiot out of myself as usual. --Æ&#38;Œ (talk) 01:57, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep: Added and nominated by a resident troll (e.g. "We don’t need policies; Wiktionary can exist without any policies." above); there are attesting quotations for the space-free form homomarriage at Citations:homomarriage, and this meets WT:COALMINE. --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:11, 30 August 2014 (UTC)


 * I thought that you said that policies were irrelevant, now you are saying that they are necessary? Oh, and your ‘troll’ accusation made me roll my eyes. Seriously, if you distrust me that much, just get somebody to block me. It’s not like this project is necessary for my happiness. Guess why. --Æ&#38;Œ (talk) 21:27, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

No consensus to delete. This may be brought to RfV if verification concerns remain. bd2412 T 16:43, 4 September 2014 (UTC)