Talk:hospitalar

RFV discussion: June 2014–January 2015
Rfv-sense (Portuguese): to hospitalize

— Ungoliant (falai) 15:35, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Why do you think this is wrong? Could you explain your case a bit more? Rædi Stædi Yæti  {- skriv til mig -} 16:01, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
 * RFV is not for thinking it is wrong, it is for thinking it doesn't exist. No case needs to be made, but simply citations need to be found and added. --WikiTiki89 16:10, 26 June 2014 (UTC)


 * The default case for RFVs is that the nominator thinks the word doesn’t pass the requirement of having three independent, permanently recorded uses (though the requirements are more lax for smaller languages). I spent some time looking for them, even the inflected and elided forms, but the only thing I could find in permanently recorded media were the adjective and scannos. Furthermore, it’s not even mentioned in the trustworthy dictionaries I have available. — Ungoliant (falai) 16:17, 26 June 2014 (UTC)


 * FWIW, I too looked on Google Books for several of the inflected forms (hospitalarmos, hospitalardes, hospitalando, and hospitalarem, hospitalava) and found nothing, although hospitalarem does seem to be a Latin word. If this fails, it won't be (as it is for some words) because no-one tried to cite it, it'll be because it really doesn't seem to be in use. - -sche (discuss) 00:43, 2 July 2014 (UTC)


 * RFV failed: no attesting quotations provided for the sense. --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:48, 17 January 2015 (UTC)