Talk:hostis humani generis

RFV
Legal. Only one citation of this not in italics. Might be valid. DCDuring TALK 23:00, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
 * IMHO this request should be dismissed on the grounds that the use of italics does not detract from the phrase's being used in English text. When italics uses are included, the phrase is easy to attest in English texts by searching in Google books. See also below. As said, let us dismiss this nomination and get to real work that increases the value of Wiktionary to its users. --Dan Polansky 10:18, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I second Dan Polansky's admonition here. — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 16:12, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Kept: clearly widespread use, (and were this RFD) no consensus for deletion. - -sche (discuss) 02:04, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Discussion should be reopened once we have clear, agreed-upon guidelines for translingual terms. - -sche (discuss) 22:02, 23 October 2011 (UTC)