Talk:huaxinluobo

xinwen
A non-standard entry (anon user: 91.104.40.130), missing traditional, not sure about toneless pinyin. --Anatoli 02:20, 7 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Same user's new enries: Muqinjie, Fuqinjie, tufaxinwen. --Anatoli 02:26, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't know what to do with him. We keep blocking his IP's, but everytime he comes back with a different IP. Jamesjiao → T ◊ C 02:30, 7 April 2010 (UTC)


 * I see, thanks. Is it 123abc striking again? --Anatoli 02:37, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * What are we verifying here? Mglovesfun (talk) 09:20, 7 April 2010 (UTC)


 * I am not sure about our rules for inclusion of toneless pinyin. If not allowed, then the entries should be deleted if they are allowed - need to be fixed. I don't see much value in having pinyin entries, though. The pesky user appeared as 91.106.51.144 today. I blocked him (those who know how many warnings he was given, will understand why). --Anatoli 02:25, 9 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Does anybody want to keep these entries? New ones are tufashangma, shangma and huaxinluobo. --Anatoli 02:28, 9 April 2010 (UTC)


 * All I'm going to say is these entries are doing my head in and we really need someone talented to draw up a proposal to exclude such useless entries. ---&gt; Tooironic 06:57, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

RFV failed, deleted all seven entries plus [[tufa]]. —Ruakh TALK 17:07, 25 August 2010 (UTC)