Talk:ignotum per æqum ignotum

RFC discussion: March–April 2011
"per æqum|aequum|equum ignotum" is not to be found at bgc. DCDuring TALK 16:05, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually all the Google hits are Wiktionary, Delete. --Mglovesfun (talk) 19:43, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Try Googling ignotum per aeque ignotum (Eroica 14:33, 9 April 2011 (UTC))

ignotum per ignotius
Wonderfool Latin entries. They seem to be worded like English entries; are these in fact Latin phrases used in English? If they are Latin (which I don't really doubt) are they sum of parts, so that only the English should remain? --Mglovesfun (talk) 14:45, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * A bgc serach for "ignotum+per+æqum|aequum|equum+ignotum" yields abundant cites of logic (or rhetoric?) sense. (Are all fallacies presumptively part of "informal logic"?). DCDuring TALK 16:08, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I assume the hits are in English, presumably a Latin phrase borrowed into English, unless the 1989 OED also does Latin definitions. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:44, 9 April 2011 (UTC)