Talk:illinio

Can we at least indicate when certain forms are non-Classical? Benwing2 (talk) 00:47, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Why would you even assume though that these forms were “unused” while the present was and the 3rd conjugation form was fully conjugated? It’s odd and would be coincidental. And besides, “illinitus” is attested from Antiquity according to Georges Plin. Val. 1, 1, standing for Gaius Plinius Valerianus, – because of baseless attribution – standing for . I don’t find this Pighinucci edition “im J. 1509 unter dem Titel Medicinae Plinianae libri V (so lautet der Titel bei Meyer Gesch. d. Botanik II 398, während Rose 39 C. Plinii Secundi medicina und Niedermann XXIX Plinius de re medica als Titel angeben) zu Rom herausgegeben” digitized though. I am going to add  because that seems to be what it is, and that Quintus Gargilius Martialis quote for the passive infinitive. Fay Freak (talk) 11:23, 25 July 2019 (UTC)