Talk:impuesto sobre bienes y servicios

impuesto sobre bienes y servicios
Dunno why, but it smells SOP --A230rjfowe (talk) 21:38, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * If goods and services tax is considered a legit entry, surely this one can be too? Donnanz (talk) 07:24, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * It seems that the form "impuesto a la venta de los bienes y servicios" with 630 Google books hits would be the preferred one among variants "impuesto sobre bienes y servicios",  "impuesto a bienes y servicios", "impuesto a la venta de bienes y servicios", "impuesto sobre los bienes y servicios",  "impuesto a los bienes y servicios", which get 4, 3, 12, 4 and 13 hits respectively. I would say we need to create an entry for "impuesto a la venta de los bienes y servicios", which would be the Spanish equivalent for "goods and services tax". It seems that Spain may be the only country where exactly this form ("impuesto sobre bienes y servicios") has been used as the Latin American countries prefer "a" over "sobre". I say "has been" because goods and services taxes have been largely replaced by value-added taxes (impuesto al valor agregado in most places but impuesto general a las ventas in Peru). Btw, "impuesto sobre bienes" looks highly suspicious to me. The author may have had "impuesto sobre bienes inmuebles" in his/her mind. --Hekaheka (talk) 03:34, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

I feel that further discussion is needed to settle this discussion. bd2412 T 02:22, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete; the rationale for keeping would be idiomaticity, but this isn't even an idiomatic way to express it AFAICT. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 06:01, 7 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as SOP. The English entry also seems SOP. As Heka shows, there are numerous unidiomatic ways to refer to such a tax. We do sometimes keep SOP-ish legal terms, but this seems less like a term or name for the tax and more like a multi-term description of the tax. - -sche (discuss) 08:07, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Deleted. bd2412 T 21:34, 13 November 2015 (UTC)