Talk:in shock

in shock
Isn't this SOP? --WikiTiki89 11:29, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Although shock needs a bit of cleanup first. --WikiTiki89 11:32, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, also almost every entry needs some sort of cleanup. It's a terrible WF entry too. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:40, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. There is something about bare-noun prepositional phrases that makes folks want to have entries for many of them, but it isn't idiomaticity. They must seem lexical exceptions to "normal", non-lexical prepositional phrases. DCDuring TALK 16:51, 18 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete, even speedily. Definition suggests it is Wonderfool seeing what he can get away with as an "entry". Equinox ◑ 16:54, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I split into a new Etymology the "shock of hair"-related senses and added something for the "emotional disturbance" sense. The use of subsenses is probably unnecessary and misapplied at least until we have enough definitions to nearly match MWOnline. It is silly to use subsenses when the etymologies are different, which is often fairly obvious - or should be. DCDuring TALK 17:10, 18 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. - -sche (discuss) 01:43, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Deleted. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 06:51, 24 October 2012 (UTC)