Talk:in two days

Shouldn't we merge the translation table with that of ? --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 18:35, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Or even with the idiomatic English ? Probably. I'll start an RFD. - -sche (discuss) 18:42, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

RFD discussion: March 2018–January 2019
This seems redundant to both day after tomorrow and overmorrow. I suggest redirecting it to the first of those pages (or the second, I don't care). (The reason for redirecting is that we also have in three days, so it makes sense to keep a redirect of the same form for this concept.) - -sche (discuss) 18:46, 12 March 2018 (UTC)


 * I have never ever heard being used. Maybe I'm not old enough. DonnanZ (talk) 19:16, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I think it's just always been very rare (Google's Ngram Viewer can't even plot it). - -sche (discuss) 04:44, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect to day after tomorrow. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 00:32, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
 * In my opinion the present entry is misconceived, as there is no definition. Even if it is "for translation purposes only" there should still be a definition. As far as redirection is concerned, I am not in favour of unexpected or "what happened there?" automatic redirects, if that is what is being suggested. In fact, I am not in favour of automatic redirects at all. Mihia (talk) 00:35, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I'd say Meta was speaking of a soft redirect, not a hard one. --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 13:02, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. The only possible use of this entry that I can think of is as an antonym for nudiustertian.  Nicole Sharp (talk) 11:33, 24 March 2018 (UTC)


 * I've centralized the translations, effectively turning this into a soft redirect to day after tomorrow, but IMO it should be a hard redirect, as it is SOP, it accordingly has no definition, and its only claim to entry-worthiness is as a translation hub, but the translations are in another hub. I think there is enough support above to do that, but I'll leave this thread open in case anyone else wants to comment. - -sche (discuss) 19:45, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Redirected. There is a clear consensus that this should not exist as is. The concern that readers will be disconcerted by typing in this entry title and being taken to something else should be sufficiently alleviated by the fact that the entry to which they are taken literally expresses the concept that they were looking for. bd2412 T 01:36, 2 January 2019 (UTC)