Talk:inclusionist

I'm not sure this word deserves an entry in Wiktionary. Wiki jargon should be separated from normal entries. The same goes for deletionist. Whee 15:41, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

inclusionist
As per CFI --Keene 08:33, 4 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep all, as properly tagged. --Connel MacKenzie 08:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as a generalized term, and remove the context if it can be verified. DAVilla 14:12, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. It ain't no Wikimedia invention, it actually dates back to late C19. JackLumber 21:55, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. This and deletionist seem to be the only jargon that applies beyond the wikiverse, though both really don't need much more than a refernce to the base word and suffix -ist.--Halliburton Shill 04:06, 6 July 2007 (UTC).

RFV discussion: January–April 2017
RFV the Wiki-related senses. This passed RFD ten years ago, but this really should have been RFV'd. --WikiTiki89 18:16, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Cited the adjective, but I would RFD it again. Wikipedia didn't invent the word and I don't see the distinction between their use and more general uses. DTLHS (talk) 18:29, 17 January 2017 (UTC)


 * RFV-passed Kiwima (talk) 00:20, 20 April 2017 (UTC)