Talk:interruption awareness

RFV
Nothing relevant in Google Books. The referenced papers are not all publicly accessible due to paywalls, and one that was accessible didn't seem to contain this two-word term at all. One of the links is to the creator's own site, which smells of spam. Is it just a sum-of-parts "awareness of interruptions"? Equinox ◑ 18:01, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, this just seems to be an SoP term which has not risen to the usage level of a set phrase. · 18:10, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Doesn't seem to be on PubMed. Considering the dearth of cites and the link to the creator's own site, I think we can delete this in under a month. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 22:47, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Since none of the public references used the term, I've now deleted it as spam. Equinox ◑ 21:11, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, I checked all of the references, the only one to use the term was the creator's personal website. Mglovesfun (talk) 22:14, 5 September 2011 (UTC)