Talk:inverted hat

RFV discussion: January 2012
RfV for the only sense, =,. It has been listed as a synonym in our entry for undefined: since I added it in December 2007, when I added it from the list of alternative names given in Caron (the suspect undefined: and the legitimate undefined: were both added by Gene Nygaard on April Fools' Day 2006); I just now created this entry, so as to open this verification request for it. I could find nothing of relevance in the first ten pages of results returned by. — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 01:10, 21 January 2012 (UTC)


 * I've added one of the only two relevant cites I could find on b.g.c. (The other one, b.g.c. wouldn't show me the snippet I needed; and anyway, it was by the same author, so no help.) —Ruakh TALK 18:10, 28 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the find. Do you think this is attestable? — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 20:52, 28 January 2012 (UTC)


 * It's used on Usenet, which counts, right? Phol 22:09, 28 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Yes, Usenet counts. Your 1995/iv/30 quot. seems to use the term in the right sense, but the author of your 1997/x/1 quot. is talking about the pronunciatory transcription for  and means . — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 04:01, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Since I've exhausted Usenet to bring the number of supporting quotations for undefined: to twelve (one is duplicated), I imagine that no one will object to my marking this RFV passed. — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 07:07, 29 January 2012 (UTC)