Talk:iste

Latin
It's said that in "Amiat. Ierem. 7, 2 (verbum istum)", which could be Codex Amiatinus, and in "Corp. inscr. Lat. 5, 1703", a book containing inscriptions, the neuter accusative singular (instead of ) appears.

CORPVS INSCRIPTIONVM LATINARUM volume 5 part 1, 1872 (arachne.uni-koeln.de/arachne/index.php?view[layout]=buch_item&search[constraints][buch][alias]=CILv5pI1872&search[match]=exact), p. 159, § 1703 reads: "hic iaceT resTvTvs peleger in pace fidelis ex africa veniT vT isTam vrbe videret * hec invisa Tellvs isTvm volvit corpvs habe [linebreak] re * [...]" (text in small caps). I guess this attest the form which then can be mentioned. -84.161.29.187 05:25, 2 April 2017 (UTC)