Talk:joint account

RFD
This was tagged RFV years ago and never listed... but frankly the fact that it's a [[joint]] [[account]] seems more pressing. - -sche (discuss) 01:53, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Keep the banking definition, it's idiomatic because you have to somehow now that it is referring to a join (bank) account, ax the other one.Lucifer (talk) 01:17, 25 March 2012 (UTC)


 * One could have a joint account at a any financial institution or indeed at many non-financial institutions. Indeed an account of a married person at any vendor is a joint liability of the married couple. At most, wording like "such as a bank account" is warranted in the absence of evidence that joint account much more frequently means "joint bank account" than account in the applicable sense means "bank account". DCDuring TALK 22:53, 7 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Does joint imply married, then?
 * Keep. This isn't just an account that's held jointly, it's a type of account where both parties are known and have defined access, restrictions, and liabilities. I could share an email address with a business partner, but that wouldn't be a "joint account". DAVilla 01:46, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
 * On the contrary, that would be a joint account / joint e-mail account. - -sche (discuss) 22:47, 10 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Kept. Note that a sense is still tagged with RFV. — Ungoliant (Falai) 03:39, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

RFV
Rfv-sense. Tagged years ago but not listed. Might be in widespread use, in which case, feel free to wave your hand at citations and de-tag the entry... - -sche (discuss) 04:18, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Is this article durably archived? If so, that's one. --Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 00:56, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Deleted. The sense was SOP, anyway. - -sche (discuss)