Talk:juglandaceous

Um, this has 'entry that should be deleted' written all over it. --but then I searched Google and see it referenced. Maybe the etymology and/or meaning is the only thing wrong. -- Then I found it in the OED (listed as 'rare botany'), fixed page.


 * Finished fixing page (formatting was wrong, definition given is not primary). Taking the description as "a word sorely lacking" at face value and adding an etymology for a word clearly derived by normal grammar was, of course, a mistake.  Mea culpa. -dmh 15:15, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)