Talk:juoksentelisinkohan

RFV discussion: May–August 2016
Definition:
 * 1) I wonder if I should run around aimlessly.

As far as I can find, this is only used in English texts discussing how you can say a lot of things in Finnish with one word. I don't doubt that it's a valid word according to the rules of Finnish morphology, but it doesn't strike me as the kind of thing one would use in actual speech to convey meaning. Chuck Entz (talk) 12:45, 2 May 2016 (UTC)


 * If the entry at least showed how this broke down into morphemic units, this entry could perhaps be useful as an example for constructing a Finnish verbal phrase. As it currently stands though, the entry just gives the headword and the English gloss, making this ... well-nigh useless.  Expand, or delete.  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 17:30, 2 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Phrasebook? ...Just kidding! Equinox ◑ 12:18, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
 * While a bit artificial, with its 2000+ Google hits this form seems to be a popular example on how to construct Finnish verb forms. I added a break-up under the etymology section. --Hekaheka (talk) 08:21, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
 * are any of those hits in a Finnish text? I was only able to find mentions of the word in English texts. Chuck Entz (talk) 14:24, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I checked the first 15 pages and found only this . The "word" doesn't make more sense than its English translation and it is not actually a surprise that hardly anyone ever uses it. What remains is this: it is a completely viable combination often used as example on how to construct Finnish words, nobody just ever uses it. Here are some other similar structures which are attestable:
 * --Hekaheka (talk) 19:58, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
 * --Hekaheka (talk) 19:58, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
 * --Hekaheka (talk) 19:58, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
 * --Hekaheka (talk) 19:58, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Added a usage note. --Hekaheka (talk) 06:06, 30 May 2016 (UTC)


 * RFV failed: no durably archived citations provided. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 13:08, 12 August 2016 (UTC)