Talk:just because

just because
In its purported idiomatic sense it looks to me like just: + because:. "Just" is certainly optional. It might make a lovely referral to a phrasebook wiki. Here, it seems to be, at best, a hard redirect to because:. DCDuring TALK 13:29, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

The first definition is unnecessary; that one is just just: + because:. The second definition is not covered in the definition of because:. Mcornelius 18:29, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
 * But would that be an indication of a need for [[just because]] rather than a reason to improve [[because]]? In fact, it would seem that sense 3 of because: is the relevant meaning. DCDuring TALK 18:34, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Hard redirect, I suppose. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 01:36, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

redirected -- Liliana • 14:30, 20 February 2012 (UTC)