Talk:kontekletser

RFV discussion: July 2021–December 2023
Dutch, one definition is a Verbo proctologism. The word seems super rare in any case and this kind of spelling is superseded, so maybe the black tie has to be thrown out with the butt toy. ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  14:15, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
 * ,, , , , , , . Some concerns (numbered by link): 1: not sure if it's archived, 2: I think we treat West Flemish separately from Dutch, 3: I'm not sure what language this is, could be archaic Dutch or West Flemish, 4: Baasroods, a dialect that should be treated as Dutch. The rest are solid attestations for sense 2. There was another thesis by Leiden University called "Birds through a ceiling of alabast : genderproblematiek in de romans van Hugo Claus" (one of his books apparently used this term), but the spam filter didn't let me give the google link. Seems to be a chiefly Belgian term. Thadh (talk) 14:43, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Okay, those are valid cites for definition 2, though it is at least somewhat awkward that this is only attested in what would be a superseded spelling. That probably deserves a usage note. ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  08:09, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

First definition RFV-failed. Second definition RFV-passed. Quotations added. I'd ask you why you think the spelling is superseded, but you don't seem to bother to reply to these things anymore. It's hard to tell, because the word isn't in any official word list, but I think this word falls under exception 8e, because people have only one bum. —Caoimhin ceallach (talk) 17:07, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Because you would expect the -en- interfix to be used in a more modern text. 8e might apply, although I am less than sure if it would be applied here by an editor. ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  23:25, 9 December 2023 (UTC)