Talk:korephile

RFV discussion: July 2014
There are citations at Citations:korephile, but these are mentions, not uses to convey meaning. --Dan Polansky (talk) 20:54, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The 1998 one is a use. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 21:36, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The 1998 quotation ("So, you would define an active korephile (lesbian pedophile) as a pederast?") seems rather mentiony, since it discusses a definition of the word and since it provides a defining gloss in the brackets: "(lesbian pedophile)". --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:39, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
 * [[WT:CFI]] specifically allows such cites. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 19:27, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Two more added. — Ungoliant (falai) 22:27, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
 * These two look good. --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:39, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Another one added. — Ungoliant (falai) 18:41, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
 * RFV passed. Thank you. --Dan Polansky (talk) 18:50, 23 July 2014 (UTC)