Talk:la sia

la ilia
Nominating la ilia, la mia, la nia, la sia, la via. These should be without the, in French we don't have le nôtre or in Spanish la nuestra. Mglovesfun (talk) 18:46, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I've now tagged the four nominees not in the header. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 20:45, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm starting to think we should go the other way, and create le mien, la mienne (etc.) in French and in the other Romance languages. It'd be tough to argue that they're SoP. Mglovesfun (talk) 22:16, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Clearly no appetite for these deletion. Kept all. Mglovesfun (talk) 10:32, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

la nia
As far as I know, any Esperanto adjective can be preceded by the definite article in this way. For example,, and so on. So I don't think these merit separate entries. 16:39, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Delete all. These are comparable to the Spanish phrases el mío, la suya, etc., which we rightly do not have entries for. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 00:02, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The French equivalents, (etc.) all got merged into ,  (etc.) Renard Migrant (talk) 12:19, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The deletion of the French terms le mien, etc. seems wrong. The French dictionary has them. — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 12:26, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't know Esperanto but there's a discussion below about le mien. could you link us to the dictionary or tell us, which dictionary, if it's a paper one? --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 00:30, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
 * In Esperanto they are not special, as you can use both mia et la mia. In modern French, however, you use only le mien . — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 00:56, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks, interesting that the dictionary's article is for [[mien]], [[mienne]]. I voted "undelete" in the RFD below, please comment there. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 01:23, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Deleted. — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 11:59, 11 September 2014 (UTC)