Talk:lagerene

RFV discussion: August 2015–June 2016
These are not accepted forms of in Danish. See DDO,. Moved from RFC. Donnanz (talk) 08:48, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Then how do you explain ? Is that a different language? (Same for for the section below.) —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 20:14, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
 * After looking at those sources I would discount most of them, hardly any for lagerene are in Danish (some are Norwegian actually), and for bestilledes they seem to be rather ancient. You would be better off doing research on Google Danmark IMO. As they are not accepted current spellings in Danish, Bokmål or Nynorsk, they could be misspellings, a problem I come across all the time when researching Norwegian words on Google Norge. Donnanz (talk) 09:20, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Old spellings are still acceptable when marked as such. "All words in all languages". —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 20:31, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
 * So you've got an old Danish dictionary tucked away in your library somewhere? I found some evidence to support your theory in the Historisk Ordbog 1700-1950 for bestille, but it's unhelpful for lager, only giving the indefinite plural . As for passive forms of verbs such as bestille, dictionaries don't usually list them and they have to be checked individually for actual usage. Donnanz (talk) 12:51, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * On second thoughts, bestillede may have been just the (optional) simple past form, with the past participle being bestillet, in line with usual practice. Compare with and . Donnanz (talk) 13:23, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * You just claimed it was an old spelling, I'd imagine Metaknowledge assumed you were telling the truth. Renard Migrant (talk) 18:07, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I assume Metaknowledge is quite capable of reaching his own conclusions. Donnanz (talk) 20:17, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
 * @Donnanz: RFV is evidence-based, not dictionary-based. It is based on WT:ATTEST. We don't go by dictionaries, except for less documented languages (LDL); we go by actual use that we can find. Dictionaries are not evidence; your finding a would-be word in an Ordbog is not finding evidence. --Dan Polansky (talk) 18:58, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
 * In a case like this I feel that all evidence should be taken into account. If you don't accept it that's fine by me, and you are quite welcome to carry out your own research. Donnanz (talk) 20:17, 18 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Of the Google Books hits I see, Automatisering/instrumentering av skip is Norwegian and Revista del Rio de la Plata is not a Germanic language and is also a scanno. Christina Brok is a Danish author, but she's the only one I see:


 * 2015, Fortidens Identitet: Identitetens Magt 1, page 56:
 * "Du kan hjælpe KC med at gøre lagerene op i morgen."
 * I don't see any hits for lagerenes. (Once this is archived: compare bestillede.) - -sche (discuss) 03:23, 21 May 2016 (UTC)


 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 23:17, 29 June 2016 (UTC)