Talk:laser light plane

RFV
[Laser Light Plane] Caps? Plural exists? SemperBlotto 15:02, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Moved. Plural exists, so definition as "a technique" is probably not the right approach. Might be SoP if there are other light planes not counting aircraft. DAVilla 09:25, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Curious. The definition comes from the referenced document, and is there mostly associated with the initialism "LLP," which is at one point expanded as "Laser Light Plane." Thereafter, "LLP" is used throughout to refer to a particular method (an implementation of a multi-touch technology) that is characterised by its employment of a "laser light plane" - a beam of laser light passed through a "line lens" so that it expands into a planar area. My interpretation, as gleaned from the document, is thus that the term "laser light plane" is SoP, but that a different meaning may be associated with the capitalised term and the initialism. In any case, the latter is a hypothesis that can be put to verification. — Pingkudimmi 13:30, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Probably SOP as DAVilla suspects; look at the citations I just added to laser light plane and Citations:light plane. - -sche (discuss) 05:09, 12 October 2011 (UTC)