Talk:leukapheresises

RFV discussion: August 2017–January 2018
Wyang (talk) 11:16, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I've found one hit on Google books. Do the plurals of easily verified singles still need three hits? SemperBlotto (talk) 11:31, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
 * The regular plural is leukaphereses, which is easily cited. I think three cites should be needed for this irregular plural of leukapheresises, to rule out the possibility of grammatical errors from one or two isolated authors. Wyang (talk) 11:42, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
 * If we called leukapheresis a Translingual term (aka Scientific or Medical Latin, ISV) we would have three cites of this irregular plural. DCDuring (talk) 02:54, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

RFV-failed Kiwima (talk) 02:10, 26 January 2018 (UTC)