Talk:light touch

light touch
The citation is for a figurative touch: that is light:. DCDuring TALK 02:24, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I'd happily speedily delete it has having no definition, and the citation doesn't justify a non-SoP meaning. Mglovesfun (talk) 10:40, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Why do we have an entry when it just says RFDEF. Move to Requested Entries. Equinox ◑ 23:07, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Already at [[citations:light touch]]. Delete this, since it may well be SOP (I have no idea what it means), and has scarcely more content than the citations page (just the POS, which is obvious, and the plural, which is fairly so). &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 19:40, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Deleted. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 22:02, 29 January 2012 (UTC)