Talk:litty

RFV discussion: November–December 2017
Cites anyone? --Robbie SWE (talk) 19:04, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Not for the supplied meaning, but it is clearly used in other contexts. I have added the missing senses, and changed the RFV to RFV-sense. Kiwima (talk) 22:41, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
 * A Usenet search for "litty" and "party" brought up this hit, although I'm not sure what meaning "litty" is being used in here:


 * https://groups.google.com/forum/#!search/litty$20party/open-cas/p-gQd47D95c/2LDpzZny5n0J


 * "On 9.21, FSD, we will hold a litty party, the guests invited will talk about Free Software and the audiences can get to know stuff about Free Software and ask questions." Khemehekis (talk) 03:30, 4 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Typo/thinko for "little party" seems likely. Equinox ◑ 17:56, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

RFV-failed Kiwima (talk) 20:37, 5 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Why is Usenet, a forum that has not been truly active for decades and is in no way representative of current informal language, so often Wiktionary's 'source of truth' for Internet citations? "Litty", as an intensified-or-something form of lit (adj, sense #4), has been very much alive in recent years, even if Usenet doesn't show it. (Granted, "able to be described as lit" was stupid as a definition, but that's no reason to call the term itself into question) 67.171.52.243 03:26, 20 April 2019 (UTC)


 * It's Special™ because &lsquo;Google possesses archives.&rsquo; —Suzukaze-c◇◇ 03:46, 20 April 2019 (UTC)